Advisers to President Donald Trump fear he could face legal jeopardy for allegedly drafting a misleading statement about Donald Trump Jr.'s meeting with a Russian lawyer, according to published reports.
Jay Sekulow, one of the elder Trump's lawyers, told the newspaper that "apart from being of no effect, the characterizations are misinformed, inaccurate, and not pertinent".
"The statement that Don Junior issued is true", Sanders said.
The initial plan was that Mr Trump Jr fully disclose what he knew about the meeting, the Post says, but that decision was reversed and his first statement said they had discussed the adoption of Russian children, not campaign issues.
"The president weighed in, as any father would, based on the limited information he had", Mrs. Sanders said.
Senate slaps new sanctions on Russian Federation , putting Trump in corner
It also imposes restrictions on anyone involved in Iran's ballistic missile program and those who do business with them. The measure would apply terrorism sanctions to the country's Revolutionary Guards and enforce an arms embargo.
But the White House insistence appears to have done little to convince congressional GOP leaders to keep trying. Trump Jr. eventually released emails showing he attended the meeting with the understanding that he would be given damaging information on Hillary Clinton from the Russian government.
One of his attorneys, Jay Sekulow, has insisted that Trump "wasn't involved" in any way in putting the statement together as the President and his aides flew back to the US on Air Force One from the July G-20 summit in Germany. I asked Jared and Paul to stop by.
Remember that first claim about how Jr.'s meeting with Russians at Trump tower was about adoption and ultimately inconsequential?
"This was...unnecessary", an anonymous source told the Post.
Mark Corallo, a spokesman for the president's legal counsel, said that Trump was not present at his son's meeting with Veselnitskaya or aware of it.
It may be, as the President's allies told the Post, that Trump simply doesn't grasp the legal implications of his actions and sees the Russian Federation probe as a family public relations problem that he alone can set right. But "it could be relevant in determining whether something else the president did, like firing (former FBI Director James) Comey, was done corruptly".
While it is not illegal for a president to mislead the public or the press, legal experts say the episode will likely be of interest to Federal Bureau of Investigation special counsel Robert Mueller as he investigates Russia's election interference and whether the Trump campaign has sought to cover up any interactions it had with Russians a year ago.
- Social media crash suspect Obdulia Sanchez plead not guilty
- Eurozone unemployment falls to lowest since February 2009
- Geoffrey Kondogbia scores the GREATEST own goal of all time against Chelsea
- Spurs Boss Says Premier League Transfer Spending Not Sustainable
- The last orca calf born in captivity at SeaWorld has died
- HTC Unveils Vive Standalone VR With Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
- E-cigarettes May Help Smokers Quit The Nasty Habit
- House GOP works to deliver on border wall for Trump
- The Big Risk in Tesla's Model 3 Launch
- Become a 'citizen scientist' to help NASA collect data during eclipse